THE CURATIVE POTENTIAL OF ETHANOL EXTRACT OF PHYLLANTHUS AMARUS

₦ 5,000.00
i h

ABSTRACT

Herbs have always formed an integral part of human health and are used in the treatment of several human diseases. One of such species which have a wide patronage is Phyllanthus amarus. P.amarus is traditionally used for various infections, inflammation and cancer. 1, 2 Dimethylhydrazine is a potent colorectal cancer inducer in animals. The present study investigated the effects of 350mg/kg body weight Ethanol extract of Phyllanthus amarus on 1, 2 Dimethylhydrazine induced colorectal cancer in Swiss Albino mice. 15 male Swiss albino mice of weight 17-30 g were acclimatized for a week and randomized into 3 groups (5 per group). Group A (-DMH), Group B (+DMH), Group C (DMH+350 mg/kg body weight of ethanol ext. of P. amarus). 20 mg/kg body weight of DMH was administered orally (24 doses, 3 times a week for 2 months). The plant extracts were administered daily for 2 weeks (14days) with the aid of a galvage immediately after colon cancer induction. In this study, the antioxidant parameters e.g, SOD, CAT, GSH, GPX of control were significantly different at P<0.05 from the untreated group(group B) as seen in the results( SOD: 0.500.092 u/mg wet tissue, CAT: 1.190.268 u/mg wet tissue, GSH: 2.411.343 µM GSH/g, GPx: 0.0050.002u/mg wet tissue). But there was no significant difference at P> 0.05 when the control group (SOD: 2.1560.64 u/mg wet tissue, CAT: 11.660.78 u/mg wet tissue, GSH: 1.230.087 µM GSH/g, GPx: 0.037 0.014u/mg wet tissue) was compared to treated group (SOD: 1.0710.022 u/mg wet tissue, CAT: 3.321.086u/mg wet tissue, GSH: 1.130.10µM GSH/g, GPX: 0.050.0038 u/mg wet tissue). For liver function test, there was significant difference between the control (168.9624.57IU/L), treated (137.353.078IU/L) and untreated group (156.5611.68IU/L) for ALT activity in the liver homogenate, but there was no significant difference at p>0.05 for AST across all groups (group A: 25.60.58IU/L group B: 29.10.679 group C: 32.592.91IU/L). For kidney function test, the concentration of Na+ was significantly increased for treated group (219.097.950mmol) at P<0.05 when compared to control (114.515.79mmol) and DMH group (208.0225.4mmol). While K+ in control group (2.6560.158mmol) there was no significant difference from treated (2.7480.203mmol) at P>0.05. But there was significant difference at P<0.05 when compared to untreated group (3.240.504mmol). For Bicarbonate ion, there was no observed significant difference at P>0.05 for control group (4.1170.08mmol) when compared to treated group (3.4670.033mmol) and untreated group (3.620.937mmol). For creatinine concentration there was no observed significant difference at P>0.05 for the control group (2.130.36mg/dL) when compared to treated group (1.590.19mg/dL) and untreated group (1.8030.2) and urea concentration there was significant difference between control group (0.7170.037mg/dL) when compared to treated group (1.3550.189mg/dL) and untreated (1.750.75mg/dL). Also, the effect of the plant extract was seen in the weights of the animals. There was significant decrease in the weight of untreated (initial wt. 23.83 1.40mg, final wt.21.001.16mg) when compared to control (initial wt. 25.171.30mg, final wt. 27.201.51mg) and treated (initial wt. 21.831.97mg, final wt. 20.002.26mg). For Caspase 9 there was no observed significant difference at P<0.05 between control (2.76650.633ng/ml), treated (2.5050.279ng/ml) and untreated (2.5860.128ng/ml). For interleukin there was no observed significant difference at P<0.05 between the control group (7.4341.353pg/ml) when compared to treated group (6.770.116pg/ml) but there was a slight significant difference between control (7.4341.353) when compared to untreated (6.3350.549pg/ml). In conclusion, the results obtained showed that ix administration of 350mg/kg body weight Ethanol plant extract has some ameliorating potentials against the carcinogenic effects of DMH induced colon carcinogenesis in Swiss albino mice.

0.0 0
Write your own review Close
  • Only registered users can write reviews
*
*
  • Bad
  • Excellent
*
*
*
Only registered users can write reviews